• ​CNBC op-ed: How the US reviews China deals for national security
• The Economist: Contraception does even more good in poor countries than thought
• The Guardian: Invest in small farmers or world will face regular food crises, says UN agency chief
• Financial Times: Hundreds of World Bank climate projects have no direct connection to climate, research finds
• Barron's op-ed: The World Bank’s Future Rests on Its Next Leader
• Vox: The World Bank can bring the world’s poor into the clean energy revolution (an interview with CGD's president) 
• Reuters: Ukraine war food price spikes may push 40 million into extreme poverty, development group says
• Wall Street Journal: China’s Financial Reach Leaves Eight Countries Vulnerable, Study Finds
• MarketWatch: Vanguard gets fresh pressure from retirement investors for relaxing its climate-change stance
• Bloomberg: Women Did Three Times as Much Child Care as Men During Pandemic​
• CNBC.com op-ed: The big question at the G-20 meeting - how far will Trump go?
• Financial Times: Foreign aid ‘fails to curb emigration from developing countries’
• Reuters: Progress in reforming development banks 'quite limited,' new tool shows
• CNN.com op-ed: More affordable electricity would transform Africa. Here’s how to get there. 
• Quartz op-ed: On Myanmar, the World Bank should follow its own policies
• Financial Times op-ed: Time to turn the screw on human rights abusers
• ​NPR: Why The U.S. Ranks At The Bottom In A Foreign Aid Index
• CNBC.com op-ed: Trump is wrong. Norwegian immigrants are not better than Haitians for the US economy ·
• Reuters: Big US asset managers cool on climate issues, think tank says​